London buses face potential 20% cut
London’s bus network could be cut by almost 20% following a Government requirement for significant savings.
Proposals on reshaping the central and inner London bus network have been set out by TfL due to the Government requiring the capital’s transport authority to reduce service levels on London’s bus network.
Due to TfL’s reliance on passenger fares for the majority of its income, the effect of the pandemic on its finances has been devastating, requiring Government support to keep public transport in London operating. Passenger numbers continue to recover, but are still significantly below pre-pandemic levels.
The Government set a number of conditions before providing emergency funding to enable TfL to keep operating, including requiring a plan setting out how to achieve significant financial savings and reduce service levels. This plan included reducing the extent of the bus network by 4% by 2024/25.
Proposals to achieve this reduction, by changing and withdrawing some bus routes in and around central London, have been published for consultation. This six-week consultation sets out how TfL will ensure the bus network continues to provide Londoners with the service they need while responding to Government requirements to make further savings.
TfL has worked to ensure that the bus kilometres removed from the network are in locations that already have a higher provision of buses.
TfL’s current short-term funding deal expires on the 24 June. If a sustainable new agreement cannot be achieved, TfL could be required to reduce bus services by nearly 20%. This is an outcome TfL says it is working hard to avoid.
“If TfL is to avoid further cuts which would damage our city’s economic recovery from this pandemic, the Government must do the right thing and come forward with a long term funding deal to support the capital’s public transport”- Deputy Mayor for Transport, Seb Dance
Deputy Mayor for Transport, Seb Dance, said: “No one wants to see reductions to our bus network, but TfL is having to consider these changes because of the savings demanded by the Government as part of the emergency funding deals during the pandemic.
“TfL has looked carefully at the routes affected in order to reduce the impact on passengers as much as possible. Routes changed are ones where there are very similar existing services or where passengers would make use of the Mayor’s ‘Hopper’ fare to reach their destination.
“If TfL is to avoid further cuts which would damage our city’s economic recovery from this pandemic, the Government must do the right thing and come forward with a long term funding deal to support the capital’s public transport – as governments of almost all other major global cities do.”
“…the proposals we are consulting on have been designed to minimise the impact on customers and ensure that the majority still have a direct bus for their journey” – Geoff Hobbs, Director of Public Transport Service Planning at TfL
Geoff Hobbs, Director of Public Transport Service Planning at TfL, said: “Significant changes in how people use transport in central and inner London mean that – as we work to meet the requirements of our funding agreement with Government – the proposals we are consulting on have been designed to minimise the impact on customers and ensure that the majority still have a direct bus for their journey.
“Adapting the capital’s bus service – such a significant part of our transport network – is what we have always done to ensure it keeps up with changing needs of Londoners. The flexible nature of the bus network means we can respond to changes in demand, both now and in the future.
“We know that these plans will have some impact on some of our customers, but we are trying very hard to ensure that we can still have the right level of service where it is needed and can deliver our long-term positive vision for the bus network.”
One thought on “London buses face potential 20% cut”
It’s just political jockeying that the Labour Deputy Mayor blames the cuts on a reduction in Conservative Government funding. The emergency funding was just that, to cover an emergency, and generous and a life-saver for the network it was. Now we are seeing a new level of long-term reduced demand, it would be madness to fund a network that is no longer needed to the same extent. The reduction in usage has been going on since 2014 and central London has been vastly over-bussed for most of the last 8 years.
The tragedy is that neither party is talking about trying to look at all of the reasons why people abandoned the network and how best to win them back.